English
U.S. says powers mull new Iran sanctions
The United States and Britain said major powers agreed on Wednesday to consider more U.N. sanctions against Iran after Tehran failed to freeze its nuclear activities, but Russia said there was no firm deal.
A British Foreign Office spokesman said the six powers had agreed in a conference call that “while informal contact between (EU foreign policy chief Javier) Solana and (Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator Saeed) Jalili will continue, we have no choice but to pursue further sanctions against Iran.”
U.S. State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos said after the conference call: “The P5+1 (major powers) are discussing next steps in the U.N. Security Council and beginning to consider possible outlines of another sanctions resolution.”
But at the United Nations, Russia’s ambassador Vitaly Churkin said there was no definite agreement among the six powers for a fourth round of sanctions against Iran
He told reporters some members of the six powers trying to persuade Iran to freeze nuclear enrichment had raised the idea of more sanctions, but added: “There have been no firm agreements or understandings or any kind of concerted work in this regard.”
The call came after Iran gave a noncommittal, one-page letter to major powers on Tuesday containing no reply to an offer by Russia, China, the United States, Germany, Britain and France to refrain from seeking more U.N. penalties if Iran freezes expansion of its nuclear work.
Iran promised a “clear response” at an unspecified date.
MONTHS OF NEGOTIATIONS
While threatening more U.N. sanctions, the United States conceded it could take months to get them through, as happened in the past three rounds of sanctions negotiations because of Chinese and Russian resistance to the move.
“I am not going to guess how long this will take and where it may ultimately lead,” Gallegos said when pressed whether sanctions could be agreed on before the end of the Bush administration’s term in January 2009.
A European Union diplomat said there would not be immediate sanctions and dialogue should continue with the Iranians. “It’s not for tomorrow,” said the diplomat of sanctions.
Churkin also said Moscow had not set a deadline for Iran to respond to the “freeze for freeze” offer, and that dialogue continued with Iran. Ministers from the six powers would meet in September to discuss Iran’s nuclear program, he added.
He made clear Russia was in no hurry to raise the issue of a fourth sanctions resolution. “I haven’t seen any pushes here,” Churkin said.
Indonesia’s U.N. Ambassador Marty Natalegawa, who represents the only country on the 15-nation Security Council that did not vote for the third round of sanctions in March, said he saw no point in the council discussing Iran now.
Rather, the six should continue their dialogue with Tehran, he said.
The major powers say they fear Tehran wants to build an atomic bomb. Iran, the world’s fourth-largest oil producer, insists it is only seeking to master nuclear technology to generate electricity.
“We are very disappointed that Iran has failed yet again to give … a clear answer to the P5+1 generous incentives package. The letter we received yesterday appears to be a stalling tactic,” Gallegos said.
“ENGAGEMENT OR ISOLATION”
British Foreign Office Minister Kim Howells said his government was also disappointed by Iran’s response.
“Iran has a clear choice: engagement or isolation. We regret that Iran’s leaders appear to have chosen isolation. … If Iran continues to refuse to come to the negotiating table, the international pressure on Iran will only grow,” he said.
German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said Iran’s reply was insufficient, and called for unity among the six powers to ensure that pressure on Iran through talks and the U.N. Security Council is successful.
France warned of more punitive action but urged dialogue.
“The path of dialogue remains open, but in absence of a clear response, Iran is choosing to expose itself to new sanctions,” said France’s Foreign Ministry in a statement.”
The major powers have said formal talks on the incentives could only start once Iran suspends uranium enrichment, the part of the program that most worries the West because it can have military use.
The No. 2 official at the U.N. nuclear watchdog will go to Tehran on Thursday in a fresh bid to get Iranian clarification about intelligence reports suggesting it illicitly tried to design atomic bombs, diplomats familiar with the matter said.
They played down speculation that Olli Heinonen, head of inspections for the International Atomic Energy Agency, was on a special mission to verify the current level of Iranian enrichment activity, noting Iran had given no apparent sign of openness to the powers’ “freeze for freeze” proposal.
Source: Reuters
More Top News
Hollywood heavyweights Robert De Niro and Al Pacino reunited on the red carpet in New York Wednesday night for the premiere of their new crime thriller “Righteous Kill” — their first film together since making 1995’s “Heat.”
The movie also stars
The Pakistani Army has been given orders to retaliate against any unilateral strike by the Afghanistan-based US troops inside the country.
Army Spokesman Maj Gen Athar Abbas confirmed the orders in a brief interview with Geo News on late Thursday night.
The
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev says he will not accept military action or new sanctions against Iran over its nuclear activities.
“We should not take any unilateral steps. It is not acceptable to opt for a military scenario. It would be dangerous,”
As the world marks the seventh anniversary of 9/11, some European experts say security improvements in the US have been undercut by fairly basic mistakes. Among the remedies is more trust in America’s laws and allies.
Seven years after the attacks
David Miliband has allegedly come in for a rather undiplomatic tongue-lashing from his Russian counterpart.
The Foreign Secretary was apparently given a furious dressing down by Sergei Lavrov over the telephone.
Mr Miliband’s criticism of Russia’s recent incursion into Georgia is believed
PIETERMARITZBURG, South Africa - A South African judge ruled Friday that prosecutors were wrong to charge ANC President Jacob Zuma with corruption, effectively clearing way for the 66-year-old former freedom fighter to become the country’s next president.
Judge Chris Nicholson’s ruling
Thailand’s political turmoil deepened Friday when the ruling coalition failed to turn up to parliament to reelect leader Samak Sundaravej as prime minister.
Lawmakers from the six-party coalition did not attend an emergency session of parliament called to choose a prime minister, three days after a court stripped Samak of power for accepting payments for hosting
Feeds